Aside from the Brother gt541 it seems like all the other companies are making us pay to be their beta testers. Look at how they resolve thier machines' problems; They tell us it is a learning curve issue yet cannot give us solid structured solutions. "Your humidity is too low" yet thier brochure states that their printer will work within 20-80% humidity, "Well yes but the optimal range is..." Your software is really buggy and non-intuitive. "Well we are working to improve it as we speak" Your machine doesn't start up right away and randomly stops working "Check your humidity level...." Great... We are right back where we started.
Justin made the analogy to a car. I will make the same analogy to the GT-541. You turn it on, it prints all day. You change the ink when empty and change the waste tray when full. This is exactly what I expect from a printer. Oddly (<-Blatant sarcasam intended) Brother is the only company to pull this off. I say oddly because they are the only company that did their own beta testing. Most of the others rushed a product to market simply to have a product out there. Standard slash and burn company tactics. Sell as much garbarge as quickly as possible then close.
How is it that my home printer can sit for a month yet I can turn it on and it prints fine? If a Kornit sat for a month it might never print again. I'm sick and tired of the same old status quo responses; Learning curve, new technology, and still developing. To me, those are R&D terms that are resolved before a product goes to market. I would be ashamed of myself if I offered most of these machines to anyone, thank god I'm not involved in their development.
Justin made the analogy to a car. I will make the same analogy to the GT-541. You turn it on, it prints all day. You change the ink when empty and change the waste tray when full. This is exactly what I expect from a printer. Oddly (<-Blatant sarcasam intended) Brother is the only company to pull this off. I say oddly because they are the only company that did their own beta testing. Most of the others rushed a product to market simply to have a product out there. Standard slash and burn company tactics. Sell as much garbarge as quickly as possible then close.
How is it that my home printer can sit for a month yet I can turn it on and it prints fine? If a Kornit sat for a month it might never print again. I'm sick and tired of the same old status quo responses; Learning curve, new technology, and still developing. To me, those are R&D terms that are resolved before a product goes to market. I would be ashamed of myself if I offered most of these machines to anyone, thank god I'm not involved in their development.