Due to space limitations, I've never had a tunnel dryer. I've always used a heat press for curing water based inks. Takes up little space and is not expensive compared to a tunnel dryer. I press for one minute at 340 F if using Permaset inks, more like two minutes if using Green Galaxy or Matsui. I haven't bothered to do thorough testing to determine the minimum that I could get away with, which obviously I should do as the time to do the testing would be recouped many times over.
Since a heat press makes physical contact with the ink/garment it transfers heat via conduction. So if the heat platen reads 340 F, then 340 F is then put in direct physical contact with the ink, no more and no less. As opposed to any type of radiant heat source, where the emitter itself is much hotter than the temperature you want the ink to reach, so distance and time become critical to avoid scorching, as well as undercuring. Point being, curing with a heat press is less fussy and error prone than using a radiant heat source.
No need to apply a lot of pressure, as all that matters is that even contact is made with the print area of the garment. I lay the garment on top of a Teflon heat press pillow thingy so that collars and seams and such don't interfere with making even contact.
A downside of cold cure additive is that it starts a clock ticking on the ink, so it must be used or tossed out within a certain period of time.
Apologies

I know it's not the question you asked, but perhaps an option to consider. Testing is the only way to answer your actual question.