Joined
·
3,633 Posts
For High Density and other special effect applications.
Attachments
-
355.1 KB Views: 83
No need to worry when you know what you're doing. The set up, burn time, art prep and print technique isn't the same with every screen printing application and a job requiring a stencil such as this would be vastly different than more common scenarios. The ink viscosity would be such that "spreading" wouldn't be as expected. And part of the equation is that P/F/P/F wouldn't be practical from a production/time standpoint. Ideal printing would require a "fill" stroke and a single pass with a lower squeegee angle as opposed to flood, print, flash, print etc. And yes, as with printing in general, cure temp is critical and must be figured and monitored and the dwell time set appropriately.that made me laugh DHOFFROAD, and I'm really worried that when its printed the ink is just going to spread out after you lift the screen. Your going to use a gallon of ink every 10 shirts. you will be able to get the same results with a print flash print flash print. and if you want it a little bit thicker flash again and print. just remember to cure slower and make sure it reaches the right temp. (It really does look like you are using a screen door for a screen). what was the exposer time for that ???
Come on, tell me that's not really for a garment. A burlap bag or for spray painting on the road...right?For High Density and other special effect applications.
Your assumption would/could be correct. Stencils like this are commonly used to print garments that require a heavier ink deposit. An ink's viscosity could be such that it won't "spread" when printed. You wouldn't use a stencil like this for process inks for example. The stencil thickness controls the ink deposit. How easily the ink passes through the mesh has to do with thread count, tension, squeegee pressure and hardness etc.this being "T-Shirt" forum i guess i just assumed that it was for a garment or such.