[tdprout]

Which of these two fine products have the most "screen" like appearence and feel? I know how great Superfilm is...but I have no experience with Sport Film Lite. If the latter has the same feel as Superfilm..that would be great!

 

[dodank]

Which of these two fine products have the most "screen" like appearence and feel? I know how great Superfilm is...but I have no experience with Sport Film Lite. If the latter has the same feel as Superfilm..that would be great!

they are both matte finish. the sportsfilm has a sticky carrier, superfilm doesn't. i use both, i use the lite when i have very fine detail.

 

[tdprout]

Which do you think is softer?

 

[Crisqo]

My vote: LITE
Can't cut detailed designs with Super.

 

[tdprout]

My vote: LITE
Can't cut detailed designs with Super.

Is it as soft?

 

[JoshEllsworth]

SFL is not as soft as Superfilm. However it is pretty soft and the best solution for detail and price. The difference is Super at approximately 60-70 microns and Sportfilm Lite at 90-100 microns.

 

[tdprout]

The difference is Super at approximately 60-70 microns and Sportfilm Lite at 90-100 microns.

I did read the specs on both...I just wanted the opinion of one who has used both products...thanks!

 

[jean518]

SF is softer and to me has the better feel. Sport Film lite is a little heavier hand.

 

[dodank]

I did read the specs on both...I just wanted the opinion of one who has used both products...thanks!

i agree with jean, use the lite for images with fine details. the sportsfilm can be used for fine details but you run the risk of when weeding some of your fine detail releasing from the carrier sheet.

 

[mkari]

sport film is soft, easy to cut
very easy to weed even for details, has many colors
easy application