Greetings,
I recently Googled a free vector image of a VW Microbus. The image I located was unbranded, but unmistakable. It was offered for free as CC0 - Creative Commons (Free for personal and commercial use).
I added stuff to the image to make it unique and funny, and I posted it to Zazzle. A few days later, I got a message my design was rejected and deleted due to violation of copyright.
So I did some searching. I not only found numerous images that were as clearly unbranded VW microbuses, but I found the same exact source image used with nothing but a text annotation beneath it. I shared this with the person who contacted me about my image, asking for clarification as to what I violated that the others hadn't. They ignored my inquiry and simply stated my image violated copyright terms, elaborating that it was in reference to a standing copyright notice from Volkswagen, not another Zazzle user.
I don't want to penalize some other person for being allowed to use the same free image while mine was rejected, but I do want to be able to sell my image. What would you do in this case? Do I keep pursuing with Zazzle? I'm thinking no, as I've already been shut down and - as I'd mentioned - I don't want some other vendor losing profits because I pointed him/her out. I just find the inconsistent enforcement of policy frustrating.
I've not shared either image here, nor the source image, as I don't want to violate the "self promotion" rules of the forum. If it's OK to, then I will share a link to my design on CafePress, where it hasn't been rejected. If it's OK to share them for the sake of clarification, however, I will.
Have you dealt with issues like this before (i.e. inequitable application of TOS rejection)?