T-Shirt Forums banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
8,278 Posts
I have now built a few led units. I have a single source that retrofits the old national and atlas 5 way units. I just built a retro fit for a Ryonet 25x36 unit. I built one a few years back that was no better in terms of under cutting then the black light florescent units. I used stronger LEDs and more of them it made all the diffrence in the world. 10 sec exposure with Saati Chem PHU. There was almost no undercutting if any at all. What I saw under the microscope may have just been screen edges. The exposure was very sharp. This is way diffrent then my original experimenters even before the commercial units were avaliable.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,387 Posts
We use an m&R starlight.
Orange emulsion.
30 s with drawdown, 7 sec burn.
No issues with anything.
Methinks the vast number of LEDs mitigated undercut issues.
Replaced 2 amergraph 150's
We do use cci emulsion for dc and wb, longer burn time, but quicker than amergraphs were.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
We bought the 40x50. Looking to get a double master frame to make the entire process even faster. Looking under the microscope there are very clean lines. And while traditionally many people prefer a single point system. The new LED system runs the best screens I have ever seen. We can easily get a 10% halftone on a 230.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
We have had our M & R Starligt for just over a month now.
There is not a better exposure unit on the market.
This unit has a lot more LED so that really helps in cutting down the exposure time.
With a one part emulsion we sre typically burning our screens from 4 to 7 seconds with about a 15 second draw down. We figure we are burning screens in about 30% of the time we had been previously.
As for holding halftones and fine lines you will find nothing better than an LED unit.
These clearly are the way of the future.
Check them out at an ISS show.
You will be blown away.
Just an FYI. M & R is so confident in the LED"S that they are offering a lifetime warranty on replacements if ever needed.
And no I do not represent M & R but it is the one I am most familiar with.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,278 Posts
We have had our M & R Starligt for just over a month now.
There is not a better exposure unit on the market.
This unit has a lot more LED so that really helps in cutting down the exposure time.
With a one part emulsion we sre typically burning our screens from 4 to 7 seconds with about a 15 second draw down. We figure we are burning screens in about 30% of the time we had been previously.
As for holding halftones and fine lines you will find nothing better than an LED unit.
These clearly are the way of the future.
Check them out at an ISS show.
You will be blown away.
Just an FYI. M & R is so confident in the LED"S that they are offering a lifetime warranty on replacements if ever needed.
And no I do not represent M & R but it is the one I am most familiar with.
Metal halide still give the same results for fine lines and halftones as a led if not just slightly better. The led advantage is low heat, low power consumption and less maintenance. This was directly from a M&R rep. I do agree the LED is the future. The commercial units though are over priced for what they have in them. I can buy more 3w UV LEDs and drivers for them then any of the commercial units for incredibly cheap prices. But this is nothing new in this industry.
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top