I don't see where there may be a problem, by you changing that one word it becomes your idea, your frase, and I don't see you breaking any ethic rules either, so go for it.
Go for it. Once you change it ,whether big or small, it becomes your original. Sooooo many people out there are doing it.
Actually, that is not correct. Just because you change something doesn't make it your idea.chinoquintero said:by you changing that one word it becomes your idea, your frase
To the question of "where's the line", you could start with a legal line like a trademark.Jspata said:where's the line
I'm not sure that helps the original poster with his legal issues.This quote always spoke to me:
“Nothing is original. Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination. Devour old films, new films, music, books, paintings, photographs, poems, dreams, random conversations, architecture, bridges, street signs, trees, clouds, bodies of water, light and shadows. Select only things to steal from that speak directly to your soul. If you do this, your work (and theft) will be authentic. Authenticity is invaluable; originality is non-existent. And don’t bother concealing your thievery - celebrate it if you feel like it. In any case, always remember what Jean-Luc Godard said: It’s not where you take things from - it’s where you take them to.” — Jim Jarmusch
Not if it's just a piece of text that has few results when you Google it. Slogans are hard to copyright (and enforce) compared to graphics, and if it's a common saying it can't be copyrighted. Had it been a logo I would not have posted the quote. It applies more to art than design, but I thought it was fitting.I'm not sure that helps the original poster with his legal issues.
It seems like an interesting philosophy, but also one that could possibly cause some legal problems down the line.
Here's a couple that you can contact. Only they will be able to tell you whether they can give free consultations or estimates based on your needs. I haven't used either of them, just passing on lines that I found in another forum:Jsapata said:Can anyone point me to a trademark attorney and tell me how many hours I might expect to be charged for a consult?
Google results are not a good indicator at all for determining intellectual property. The US Copyright Office website should be searched for copyrights and the US Trademark Office should be searched for trademarks.Not if it's just a piece of text that has few results when you Google it.
Graphics and designs are eligible for copyright. But slogans are eligible for trademark.Slogans are hard to copyright (and enforce) compared to graphics, and if it's a common saying it can't be copyrighted.
It's actually best NOT to post the phrase in a public forum. It's not only read by forum members, it's also indexed by Google and many other people read the information posted.Why not try post your phrase and maybe others can give you a better opinion. I don't think people will steal them or let's say they will, there is no stopping them later.
Maybe more or maybe less. Maybe almost the same if we reduce the figures into percentages. I would love to know though. But I think it would be correct to say that the internet makes it easier and faster to "infringe". . ..
So whadda think. ? Has the advent and growth of the internet INCREASED infringments of copyrights and trademarks or decreased them and helped companies fight these infringements. ?
I think the first.
Good Luck
Mark
The problem is it's very hard to provide an example without providing the example. I fully understand, and support, not being specific. But without being specific... what can we really help you with? Except vague advice on the law itself.So in your opinion Mark, is this an example of infringement you are concerned the internet is helping increase? More importantly, how would you feel about using "I hate Sunday's" after you saw "I hate clowns" or if you saw "I hate Sunday's" on a shirt if you were the one using "I hate clowns?" That is the information I was really looking for with my question before it went and got all legal like.![]()