T-Shirt Forums banner

Changing resolution of image from 72 ppi to 300 ppi

7689 Views 17 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  miktoxic
Hey all,

I am just getting into using photoshop (using elements right now) and I have a couple of questions. I have an image I wanted to get printed on a hoodie. The original image was 72 ppi and the pixel dimensions are: Width= 1539 pixels. Height = 1168 pixels.

I read that it is usually recommended to use 300 ppi for shirt printing. What would be the best way for me to change the ppi to 300 without sacrificing image quality?

I used the image size feature in elements and tried 2 different ways after reading. The first one I used was changing the resolution to 300 ppi and leaving all boxes checked (Scale Styles, Constrain Proportions and Resample Image). The second one I tried was the same thing except I left Resample Image unchecked.

I noticed that when I unchecked Resample Image and set the ppi to 300 the document size would shrink down too.

Also I would like to know what option to use on the Image Size on the bottom (bicubic, bicubic smoother,bilinear, etc)?

Sorry about the long post lol. Thanks
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Right now your image at 72 dpi is 21.4" wide by 16" tall. If you convert to 300 dpi without resampling (the only way to keep the image quality), it would be 5.1" wide by 3.9" tall. If you convert to 300 dpi and resample the image, it will look like Mario did in Donkey Kong if you were to print it at full size.

The problem with starting out with a 72 dpi image is that it has to be huge to get to 300 dpi and still have an image that is a good size for printing on a garment. Typically stuff you find on the internet is not big enough to convert. You only have so many pixels in a raster (bitmap) image. You can't grow more by changing the dpi. There is the finite amount of pixels, and all you can do is spread them in tighter or loser groups per inch. The larger the spread, the worse it looks at larger print sizes.

Your image has about 1.8 million pixels in it. To print large prints, like on garments, you need raster images with around 20 million or more pixels in them. They need to start life with that many pixels because, like I said, you can't grow more. With some expensive software like onOne's Perfect Resize, you can fake grow more pixels with good results.

One thing to note, vector images are not pixel dependent, they can be scaled up or down and then converted to 300 dpi raster images for printing. If you start out with a raster image, you need to start at 300 dpi full printing size. If you work with vector images you don't have a size problem to worry about.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 4
That is probably the best explanation of this issue that I've ever read!
Yup - you can start off with an image made of balls 1 layer thick. You can make the layer 2x the resolution by stacking the balls 2x high. But the image area will be smaller (less balls). You can't just make new balls out of nothing.

Internet images are typically 72 balls (or pixels) per square inch. If you want 300 per square inch, you need to start off with a higher resolution image.
most people who post images on the internet @72 dpi do it purposely so people just can't steal their image and use it for profit. if this was given to you by a customer tell them that you need i higher res. copy of the work. if not you'll have to use the image as a template and redraw it in a graphics program.

you can always go down from a higher image size, never up without pixelation.
Thank you all for the great explanations and advice. The highest resolution of this photo would be 72 ppi. I am really opting to use Perfect Resize to see how well it works. Is there any specific settings I should know for getting the best results in perfect resize (other than changing the 72 ppi to 300 ppi)?

The image is a photo which seems to be very high quality. If I was to draw it on another program (I am assuming you mean adobe illustrator, corel draw?), it would be very difficult to achieve the same real life results.
How are you printing it?.....Not all printing methods require 300 dpi....
How are you printing it?.....Not all printing methods require 300 dpi....
I thought 300 dpi would be the better quality and if I was to use it originally as 72 ppi it would be blurry? I am intending to use wordans.com.
I thought 300 dpi would be the better quality and if I was to use it originally as 72 ppi it would be blurry? I am intending to use wordans.com.
How are they printing it?.....
How are they printing it?.....
It will be a digital print since it is a photo. It says on the website that they recommend a minimum size of 1000 x 1000 pixels and in between 150-300 ppi.
I will be guessing here...But it sounds like DTG.....If so, less than 300 should work okay....At 200 your image will print at 7.69"w x 5.84"h.....At 175 your image will print 8.79"w x 6.67"h....At 150 your image will print 10.26"w x 7.78"h......

There should be no need to change your file at all....
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I will be guessing here...But it sounds like DTG.....If so, less than 300 should work okay....At 200 your image will print at 7.69"w x 5.84"h.....At 175 your image will print 8.79"w x 6.67"h....At 150 your image will print 10.26"w x 7.78"h......

There should be no need to change your file at all....
Will there be any real quality differences between say using perfect resize to change it to 300, compared to using 150?
wrong. 72 dpi changed to 300 dpi no matter what size will pixelate.
wrong. 72 dpi changed to 300 dpi no matter what size will pixelate.
Certainly not my experience......I place 72 dpi photos in my Illustrator files and resize them to 300 dpi and they work just fine....
Changing from 72 to 300 will pixelate. Depending on the quality of the piece one will be more noticeable then another.
Will there be any real quality differences between say using perfect resize to change it to 300, compared to using 150?
When printing in a dtg method dpi doesn't matter. It's the pixel dimension and inch dimension that matters. Pixel should be at least 2k if it's photo realistic and the inch dimension should be at least the size you want to print it at and not smaller. Of course 300 dpi will be nice but sometimes it's just an overkill and increasing the format size which can make a rip program operate slower.
Appreciate all the advice everyone. Just to try, I downloaded programs like photozoom, alien blowup and perfect resize. I find I got the best results from blow up and photozoom. What I did was try experimenting with the resolution. I bumped it to 300 PPI and I changed the width to 32. CM and the height was changed to 24.29 CM. It came out pretty nice (for a 200% zoom in). It actually looks a bit more clear than the original (original was 72 ppi, 54.29 CM width, 41.20 CM height. NOTE that this is after I cut the image out), when I used photo zoom.

When printing in a dtg method dpi doesn't matter. It's the pixel dimension and inch dimension that matters. Pixel should be at least 2k if it's photo realistic and the inch dimension should be at least the size you want to print it at and not smaller..
The original image is 72 ppi, 54.29 after I cut it in width (original before cut was 61.80 CM), 41.20 CM height and has pixel dimensions of 1539 width, 1168 height. After I did the 300 ppi resolution and 32 CM width, 24.29 CM height, the pixel dimensions were 3780 width, 2869 height.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
the solution to this whole mess is never except a 72 dpi image. it was made to post on the internet and not be used by others. that's the only reason they exist.

garbage in garbage out.
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top