One very small piece of advice: if you haven't already, then set up a redirect to forward any mail sent to
[email protected] to
[email protected] (i.e.
[email protected] to
[email protected]). With poor kerning it can be hard to tell the difference (and if poor kerning gets combined with poor printing, there sometimes
is no difference), and both are names. It's a longshot you'll miss mail because of it, buy why risk it?
I agree with Rhonda about the ToC.
Personally I'm finding the black and white a little too much - combined with the limited pallette used in the shirts, it's very samey. It means there's little visual distinction between your product and your catalogue. The shirts are just blending into the backgrounds.
I'd change some of your names: "New Breed" is the shirt with "New Breed Contender" on it, yet there's a shirt with "New Breed" centred on a banner. With the same slogans being re-used again and again, it doesn't make much sense to use them as titles as well.
The shirt design is a bit monotonous. I think you could afford to cut a few - as it is it looks like you've come up with a bunch of different design alternatives based on the same idea, and then just run with them
all. When you get to something like the Foo Dog II it's really refreshing because it stands out. On another note, I'd definitely question the wisdom of putting your complete website URL on the front of a shirt.
The "Classic." shirt... you're planning on ending the company in 2009 then? You've been running 40 years? Personally I really hate date shirts that don't mean anything.
Bruce Lee shirt... drop it if you didn't get the license. Congratulations if you did.
Your page titles and ToC aren't always in agreement (e.g. Swoosh Stencil vs. Stencil).
Is there a reason for separating oversized and allover? Both would need to be printed on a belt printer (or equivalent).
But overall, the thing has good consistency. You've decided on a brand aesthetic and pushed it. Both very important.