My xxl tall tee pro club shirts just came in the mail..I bought 3...and I'm sad to say they do have that heavy feel but they are almost stiff-like, the sleeves hang outward and the shirt does not hang loose like I want it to, almost as if it were stuck into position. Footlocker tees hang loose but stretch too easily, I wanted a loose tall tee but just of better quality, not some stiff, smaller version. XXL tall footlocker tees are clearly bigger than xxl pro club tall tees also. Anyone have a suggestion for me?
This is what I have been lookin at. http://gildan.com/distributors/catalog/ The 2000T, I am pissed they don't have S,M so I might not buy them because of that reason only!!! Even though I like Gild
I ordered from ProClub before, and wanted an adult XX. They sent me tees small enough for a kid! They said they have a no return policy, but I wanted my money cause they sent the wrong size. So I sent them back, and they sent them back to me, saying I wore them, which I didn't, I had to try them on though to see if they fit! Luckily the credit card company credited me. Pro Club sucks big time!!
o I sent them back, and they sent them back to me, saying I wore them, which I didn't, I had to try them on though to see if they fit!
Not to be nitpicky, but I think to them, if you try them on to see if they fit, that equals "wore them" as far as their ability to sell that item as new.
Not to be nitpicky, but I think to them, if you try them on to see if they fit, that equals "wore them" as far as their ability to sell that item as new.
True that. But as long as I got my money back, it's all good...
Not to be nitpicky, but I think to them, if you try them on to see if they fit, that equals "wore them" as far as their ability to sell that item as new.
Clothing stores sell items that have been tried on for fitting as new. Why would a mail order garment be any different?
Because a clothing store controls the environment for the fitting.
Every company is free to set their own policies regarding returns.
I figured this was the logic but I still don't agree. A clothing store can't watch you as you try the garment on to see if you are following all of their rules. It is an assumed thing that because you are in the store you are following the rules.
The garment is then folded/hung and still sold as new.
I don't disagree that stores can set their own policies but I do disagree with the idea that fitting of a garment in a shop is any different from fitting a garment at home when received from mail order. If a shop wants to say "no refunds or exchanges" that is very different from semantics of when is a piece of clothing considered used.
Obvious wear, damage, tag removal. Those are things that would trigger worn, not whether you put it on and took it off to check for size....
Now if you wrestled with a skunk and were covered in sharp barbs and tried a shirt on then took it off, I'd probably side with the store.
I don't disagree that stores can set their own policies but I do disagree with the idea that fitting of a garment in a shop is any different from fitting a garment at home when received from mail order. If a shop wants to say "no refunds or exchanges" that is very different from semantics of when is a piece of clothing considered used.
I think it probably has to do with customer expectations and managing returns.
When you go into a mall/retail store, the consumer knows/expects that the garments that they purchase from the rack may have been tried on before.
When a customer buys from an online store, I'm pretty sure they have the expectation that they are getting a new/unworn item.
Also, when you buy the item from the mall/retail store, take it home, and then return it to the store, they don't sell it as new.
So maybe it's that "take it home"/unknown variable element that makes it "not new" anymore.
Of course they don't know exactly what you're doing in a dressing room, but at the same time, it's a LOT more of a controlled environment than when it leaves the store.
pro club tee...not good? 
